Detection of intestinal protozoa in the clinical laboratory

J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):712-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02877-13. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

Abstract

Despite recent advances in diagnostic technology, microscopic examination of stool specimens remains central to the diagnosis of most pathogenic intestinal protozoa. Microscopy is, however, labor-intensive and requires a skilled technologist. New, highly sensitive diagnostic methods have been developed for protozoa endemic to developed countries, including Giardia lamblia (syn. G. intestinalis/G. duodenalis) and Cryptosporidium spp., using technologies that, if expanded, could effectively complement or even replace microscopic approaches. To date, the scope of such novel technologies is limited and may not include common protozoa such as Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, or Cyclospora cayetanensis. This minireview describes canonical approaches for the detection of pathogenic intestinal protozoa, while highlighting recent developments and FDA-approved tools for clinical diagnosis of common intestinal protozoa.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / methods*
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / trends
  • Cryptosporidium / isolation & purification*
  • Cyclospora / isolation & purification
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / methods*
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / trends
  • Dientamoeba / isolation & purification
  • Entamoeba histolytica / isolation & purification
  • Giardia lamblia / isolation & purification*
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic / diagnosis*
  • Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic / parasitology
  • Parasitology / methods*
  • Parasitology / trends
  • Protozoan Infections / diagnosis*
  • Protozoan Infections / parasitology