Parenteral aminosidine is not effective for Peruvian mucocutaneous leishmaniasis

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Jun;76(6):1128-31.

Abstract

Few therapeutic options are available for mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL). We conducted a randomized open trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of parenteral aminosidine sulphate (AS) 14 mg/kg/d for 21 days compared with intravenous meglumine antimonate (MA) 20 mg/kg/d for 28 days in patients with moderate MCL in Cuzco, Peru. Cure was defined as complete healing with re-epithelialization within 1 year of follow-up. The trial was stopped after 38 patients were enrolled (17 in the MA group and 21 in the AS group) because of marked differences in response. Study groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. Cure rates were 0/21 in the AS group compared with 8/17 (47%, 95% confidence interval: 23-71%) in the MA group (P < 0.001). Side effects and laboratory abnormalities were mild in both groups. We conclude that parenteral AS given on its own is not effective for MCL in Peru.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Antiprotozoal Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Antiprotozoal Agents / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Parenteral
  • Leishmania braziliensis / growth & development*
  • Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous / drug therapy*
  • Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous / parasitology
  • Male
  • Meglumine / administration & dosage*
  • Meglumine / adverse effects
  • Meglumine Antimoniate
  • Nasal Mucosa / drug effects
  • Nasal Mucosa / parasitology
  • Organometallic Compounds / administration & dosage*
  • Organometallic Compounds / adverse effects
  • Paromomycin / administration & dosage*
  • Paromomycin / adverse effects

Substances

  • Antiprotozoal Agents
  • Organometallic Compounds
  • Paromomycin
  • Meglumine
  • Meglumine Antimoniate